Skip to main content

Side by side

Reverse ProxyvsLoad Balancer

What is the difference between a reverse proxy and a load balancer?

Updated 2 min read6 differences

In short

A reverse proxy forwards requests to the servers behind it and adds TLS, caching and security, while a load balancer spreads load so no server is overloaded.

Reverse Proxy

A reverse proxy is a server that sits in front of web servers, accepts client requests on their behalf, and forwards each request to the right backend server.

Read the page on Reverse Proxy

Load Balancer

A load balancer is a server or service that spreads incoming traffic across several backend servers so no single one is overloaded and the app stays available.

Read the page on Load Balancer

Reverse Proxy and Load Balancer compared

AspectReverse ProxyLoad Balancer
Main jobAct as the single front door for backend serversSpread traffic across multiple servers
Number of backendsUseful even with just oneNeeds a pool of two or more
Network layerLayer 7: understands HTTPLayer 4 (TCP/UDP) or layer 7 (HTTP)
Typical featuresTLS termination, caching, compression, URL routingHealth checks, balancing algorithms, sticky sessions, failover
Security roleHides backends, filters requests, enforces rate limitsRemoves failed servers and hides backend addresses
ScopeUsually one site or a group of servicesCan span servers, availability zones or regions

The difference, explained

A reverse proxy is a server that accepts requests from clients on behalf of one or more backend servers, forwards them and returns the responses, so clients never talk to the backends directly. A load balancer distributes incoming traffic across a pool of servers using an algorithm such as round robin or least connections, and removes unhealthy servers from the pool.

The difference is their main purpose. A reverse proxy is the front door: it terminates TLS, caches and compresses responses, rewrites URLs, routes paths like /api and /app to different services, and hides the internal network. A load balancer is about distribution and availability: it only makes sense when there are several servers to share the work, and it can operate at layer 4 (TCP and UDP) or layer 7 (HTTP).

In practice the roles overlap heavily. Most reverse proxy servers can also load balance, and every layer-7 load balancer is a kind of reverse proxy, so one component often does both jobs. A common setup puts a layer-4 load balancer at the edge, spreading traffic across several reverse proxies that then route requests to application servers.

A common misconception is that a reverse proxy is only useful with many servers. Even with a single backend, it adds TLS, caching, rate limiting and protection. In the other direction, a layer-4 load balancer does not read HTTP at all, so it cannot route by URL or cache responses.

Which one should you use?

Choose Reverse Proxy when…

  • You need TLS, caching or compression in front of an app.
  • You want to route different URL paths to different services.
  • You have a single backend but want to hide and protect it.

Choose Load Balancer when…

  • Traffic is more than one server can handle.
  • The service must stay up when individual servers fail.
  • You are balancing non-HTTP traffic, such as database or game connections.

Readers ask

Is a load balancer a reverse proxy?

A layer-7 load balancer is a kind of reverse proxy, because it receives client requests and forwards them to backends. A layer-4 load balancer only forwards network connections and doesn't inspect HTTP.

Can one server be both a reverse proxy and a load balancer?

Yes. Most modern reverse proxy servers can spread traffic across several backends, so small and medium systems often use one component for both roles.

What is the difference between a reverse proxy and a forward proxy?

A forward proxy acts for clients that reach out to the internet, while a reverse proxy acts for servers that receive traffic from the internet.

Read a random page
Open today's review
Switch to the dark theme
Read this page in Türkçe

More

Settings